A BRIEF HISTORY OF ACCESS...
Committed to making a difference!
Stimulated to action by the recognition that students of color were not receiving the equal chance of getting into higher education, UCLA students began to investigate channels for implementation of the new urban and minority programs. In 1968, the Black Student Union (BSU) and the United Mexican American Student (UMAS) decided to have a committee specifically for the admissions of Afro-American and Chicane and Latine students whose percentages of students at the university did not reflect that of the general population.
A program expanding the opportunities for higher education was implemented on an experimental basis at UCLA. This program was created in an effort to utilize untapped community resources, that is to say, students with unrealized high potential and the ability to benefit from higher education. This program that emerged from BSU and UMAS was called the High Potential Program (HPP), which started in October 1, 1968 under the Department of Special Education. The program would allow students from the community and nontraditional students-gang leaders, activist, etc, who showed potential to attend special classes at UCLA and eventually transition them to become UCLA students. Out of the 100 students of HPP, 74 students were successful. The program ended after 1 year because 2 High Potential students and Black Panthers members were killed outside Campbell Hall.
On July 20, 1995, The Regents of the University of California adopted SP-1 Standing Policy 1 (SP1) as a resolution that prohibited the consideration of race, religion, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin as criteria for admission to the University or to any program of study. As well as SP-2, a resolution that prohibited the consideration of the same attributes in the University's employment and contracting practices.
On November 6, 1996, California voters passed Proposition 209, which prohibits the state government institutions from considering race, sex, or ethnicity, specifically in the areas of public employment, public contracting or public education. After the passing of prop 209, the number of Chicane and Latine students at UCLA drastically decreased.
The dramatic decrease in the number of Latine matriculation in higher education, especially in UCs, led to the creation of student-initiated, student-run access and outreach programs and UCLA's Student Initiated Outreach Center (SIOC). MEChA decided to create an outreach project that would help outreach to students from low-income communities to make sure they had the resources to apply and reach higher education. As a response to Proposition 209 and UC Board of Regents Standing Policy 1 & 2, MEChA Xinachtli was created in 1998 as a result of the repeal of Affirmative Action in California.
Xinachtli is one of seven student-initiated, student-run, student-funded projects at UCLA. We have worked with both UC-eligible & non-UC-eligible educationally underrepresented students since the spring of 1998 to address the inequitable education system our students from marginalized & under-resourced communities endure.
MEChA Xinachtli is a student-run, student-initiated access project that is dedicated & designed to promote higher education as well as to empower Latine Communities and aims to dismantle the Chicane/Latine Educational Pipeline by promoting higher education, raising socio-political awareness, and building student leadership among Latinx youth from local communities.
Xinachtli
"Xinachtli" (Sheen-Ach-Tlee) comes from the Indigenous Mexica language of Nahuatl, which translates to "germinating seed." It is at this precise moment when a seed bursts that is neither plant or seed, but infinite possibilities. According to the Indigenous Mexica cosmovision, this is the time of true learning.
MEChA de UCLA is now ELAS
Empowering Latines Against Struggle
Why is this necessary?
Since being founded in 1969, MEChA de UCLA (and the institution of MEChA broadly) has caused, perpetuated, and remained complicit in the continuation of colonial, imperialist violence.
Currently, our name is an acronym for "Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano/a/x de Aztlán". To understand the need for our name change, it is important to understand why our current name is so harmful.
Firstly, the Chicano identity rose to popularity in the 1960s and 1970s as primarily a Mexican-American political identity. For those early self-identified "Chicanos", the identity was meant to differentiate between strictly being "Mexican" or "American", and instead capture the unique experience of those, who while born in America, had familial roots to Mexico. As such, the identity both explicitly and implicitly, left out non-Mexican identities, including Central Americans, South Americans, and the
Black and Indigenous communities of what is today considered "Latin America".
Secondly, the term "Aztlán" refers to an idea derived from Chicanismo. Specifically, it refers to the supposed homeland of the indigenous Aztec people prior to their migration to modern-day Mexico and the Yucatan Peninsula. The territory covers essentially all of Mexico and the current North & Southwest of the United States (especially the territories annexed by the U.S. in 1848). It is a severely problematic and harmful idea as it builds on centuries of Indigenous erasure and mestizaje (the erasure of Indigenous histories and genocides by Latin American countries to legitimize their nation-state and national identity). Under the idea of Aztlán, indigenous peoples are imagined as a community of the past whose histories were absorbed peacefully into the Mexican (or other national) identity. It ignores the continued existence and resistance of Indigenous peoples to settler colonialism, including Latin American nations. Likewise, it also perpetuates this false idea that all Mexicans or Chicanes, or even all Latines, are indigenous; a harmful claim that silences and ignores actual Indigenous voices and power.
Here at UCLA specifically, MEChA has been complicit in the perpetuation of these harmful ideas and narratives. MEChA de UCLA has, throughout its history, engaged in behaviors, actions, and decisions rooted in the
exclusionary ideas of Chicanismo, Mexican hegemony, mestizaje, and superficial identity politics. Moreover, MEChA de UCLA has historically been a space where community members have been excluded, ostracized, or otherwise harmed under rhetoric and actions that can be characterized as nothing less than being anti-Black, anti-Central American, anti-Indigenous, xenophobic, transphobic, and wholly contrary to the organization's espoused belief in equity, justice, and global liberation for oppressed peoples. As a result, there is a long history in MEChA of individuals and communities leaving our space in response to the interpersonal and structural violence and harm they underwent.
Let it first be clear that the calls for MEChA to rename, address its ills, and set a new direction forward have been going on for years, if not decades. Over the past few years, recent generations of MEChA leaders have led an internal shift within our organization to recognize this history, reject these ideas, and ensure the safety and inclusion of all communities in our spaces.
No current MEChA Board Member or General Member holds, expresses, practices, or perpetuates these harmful and divisive politics, narratives, and ideas. And if they do, then let it also be explicitly clear, that such individuals do not have the support or endorsement of our organization and that we commit ourselves to directly addressing such incidents, privately and publicly. Our organization is now filled by a generation of Board Members and General Members who want to recognize this flawed history, make genuine commitments, and move forward towards a fresh start for our organization and help build solidarity with your organizations and all of our communities. Despite this, however, the fact remains that our organization cannot truly be committed to these new values and practices while still adhering to a name that carries so much harm and shameful history.
THAT IS WHY WE HAVE RENAMED TO EMPOWERING LATINES AGAINST STRUGGLE (ELAS)
What does this really mean?
Let it be unequivocally clear, however, that ELAS is not and will never seek to become the sole Latine voice or organization for Latine students on campus. We will never speak or act for anyone or any community besides our own organization. We reject any claim to officially represent all Latine students to the University. In fact, as ELAS, we make an explicit commitment to utilize our political power and mobilization capacity to amplify the advocacy of all Latine student organizations and communities, to respect their autonomy, and to always follow their lead. As ELAS, we will be vocal about the state of Latine students on our campus, but that will never come with the suggestion or practice that we are the sole voice and decision-maker for our communities.
We recognize that our commitment to these changes in our space extends far beyond a name change. That is why, as ELAS, we also commit ourselves to consistently ensuring that we are practicing what we preach and calling out/addressing if and when we veer from that commitment. While much of what action on this commitment will look like will depend on our members. Still, we commit ourselves to the following:
-
To utilize institutional access and resources currently affiliated with MEChA de UCLA to advance all-Latine advocacy on campus
-
To not overstep the autonomy and direction of other organizations, especially those from communities who felt ostracized or harmed by MEChA de UCLA. Rather when permitted, we will amplify the advocacy of all Latine communities and all organizations on campus that are dedicated to cross-cultural coalitions and liberation for all.
-
To genuinely support the success and sustainability of current projects, events, and components under MEChA, including ensuring their availability, access, and representation of all campus Latine communities.
-
To truly mobilize our students and community towards action wherever and whenever needed.
Why ELAS?
EMPOWERING
ELAS will strive to provide a space where students feel empowered to have a presence on campus. We will serve as one of the many Latine-serving student groups on campus where folks can engage with others who share similar backgrounds and community goals.
LATINES
ELAS is explicitly committed to building a more inclusive space for all Latine identities on our campus. We recognize that "Latine" as an identity carries negative political and historical connotations. ELAS utilizes the "Latine" identity solely in hopes of reclaiming autonomy over our cultural narratives and to providing greater accessibility for students, especially those new to campus, to engage with our space.
AGAINST
ELAS aims to build true solidarity in our community against excluding identities and generate strong, genuine cross-community relationships. We will always reject any notion, speech, or action that divides Latine students.
STRUGGLE
ELAS is committed to a mutual struggle for justice, resources, and access, on campus for all students; our struggle is not just a Latine struggle. Above all else, ELAS is a working-class organization that welcomes all people committed to justice and liberation for all oppressed peoples